Tag Archives: the help

Help Me

Why, oh why, do I hate The Help? I mean, it’s clearly such a benevolent, well-intentioned movie. It just wants to remind people about the evils of racism in a fun, entertaining way. How can I hate a movie that’s against racism? Do I not want to have fun and be entertained? What’s wrong with me?

Well, barring the possibility that I’m actually a racist killjoy, here’s why The Help pissed me off so much:

  • It’s so fundamentally dishonest! It softens and flattens out real-world history to better suit its resolutely simple-minded ends. According to The Help’s cartoonish worldview, Jackson in the early ’60s was the perfect place to play wacky, low-stakes pranks. Racism was kept in place by a handful of bitchy housewives, and it could be overcome with some spunk and elbow grease. (You go, Skeeter!) Yes, the movie does feature the assassination of Medgar Evers and the arrest of one of the maids. But these are mere footnotes to the film’s anachronistic hijinks.
  • It’s so blaaaaah. I can’t remember the last time I watched a movie this aesthetically indifferent. It’s a mushy blob of sunlight, pastels, period-specific hairstyles, with a generic score that telegraphs every single (clichéd as hell) emotional beat. Each aspect of The Help’s production has been calculated to cozily, inoffensively wash over the viewer. I’m shocked it doesn’t have an unseen narrator to murmur, “Here comes the dramatic part!” and “It’s time for a slapstick interlude.” (I’m also shocked that I can speak in anything but baby talk after being anesthetized by The Help.)
  • It has absolutely no tonal modulation. It’s either all laughs or all drama, veering wildly between those two registers for all 2 1/2 hours. Its latter half leans more heavily toward the dramatic, which entails lots of hushed confrontations and Oscar clip moments, but it still has room for a few entirely giggly departures, most notably the “eat my shit” scene. It’s as if writer/director Tate Taylor sees seriousness and comedy as oil and water, and never the twain shall meet.
  • Its storytelling is utterly half-assed. Kathryn Stockett’s novel The Help is a pretty hefty book, bulging with subplots, which makes the adaptation process tricky. The wrong solution, however, is to lazily import fragments of various storylines. Two examples stand out as especially egregious: first, the arrest of the villainous Hilly’s maid Yule Mae. It’s a jarring twist, but then… nothing. No follow-up. We see Yule Mae in prison for a few seconds, laughing as she reads Skeeter’s book, and get a casual mention of her toward the end. That’s it! In the end, Yule Mae’s nothing but a plot device—a human MacGuffin who gives the movie some extra momentum.
  • The other example is Skeeter’s on-off relationship with her beau Stuart. At first she turns him down, then she dates him, then he berates her, then they break up. It’s a shaggy dog subplot. Doesn’t further the story, doesn’t teach us more about Skeeter, does nothing but awkwardly shoehorn in a tepid romance. It would help, of course, if Stuart had any traits beyond “is vaguely racist,” or if he and Skeeter had any chemistry at all.
  • Most frustratingly of all, the film has three great performances that get dragged down into its bland shit. Viola Davis as Aibileen is The Help’s Atlas, holding up the heavens; she’s a reservoir of strength, resilient despite a lifetime of grievances. She’s pissed off and fatigued, but keeps it all bottled up for the sake of her life and livelihood. Davis brings the anger but masks it. Octavia Spencer and Jessica Chastain can’t match the weight of her performance, but they establish a strong comic rapport—Chastain as a childlike redneck housewife and Spencer as her maid, who cuts through everyone’s bullshit. The fact that these three are stranded in this shitty movie is a great injustice.

So that, more or less, is why I hate The Help. It sucks! It oversimplifies the Civil Rights era at every opportunity! It wastes an enviable cast! It’s a pain to watch! Hell, the most positive blurb I can offer is “It’s somewhat better than The Blind Side.”


Filed under Cinema

Raising Brows

By Andreas

“If it had been released 50 years ago, The Help would have been the cinematic event of the summer.” This is how critic Stephen Farber began a piece on middlebrow message movies published two weeks ago by the L.A. Times. No, I’m not kidding, and oh, it gets worse. The whole article reads like a satirical attempt at bad, counterintuitive criticism. Maybe there’s a good argument to be made for valuing gently progressive, Stanley Kramer-esque dramas in the 21st century, but Farber sure isn’t making it.

That opening sentence certainly doesn’t bolster his credibility. Does he seriously think that the only difference between 2011 and 1961 is that critics now are more “persnickety” and less open to middlebrow fare? Does he really not suspect any legitimate reasons, reasons other than widespread critical bias, why the passage of that half-century should lead to “lukewarm” reviews for The Help? This colossal blind spot (or should I say blind side?) hobbles his argument from the get-go, because most of the vitriol currently aimed at The Help is spurred by its racial politics first and its status as a well-intentioned prestige picture a distant second.

But no, if you ask Farber, critics are unmoved by The Help and its bland brethren because these days, they cherish trashy genre movies instead. (He doesn’t mention Pauline Kael by name, but her influence is obvious.) So these poor, tasteful movies suffer the indignity of—as Farber says of The King’s Speech— “not [being] universally loved.” They might win Best Picture, but what’s the point if a few heartless critics still mock them? Alas, the tragic plight of a middlebrow, Oscar-baiting drama… hey, you know, that sounds like a pretty good story for a movie!

Honestly, the piece is so lazily written it’s like he’s asking for bloggers to dissect it. He quotes negative reviews of social problem dramas like The Whistleblower and A Better Life as evidence of anti-middlebrow bias, but never takes on the critics’ claims with any specificity. He never even addresses the possibility that these might just be, say, mediocre or bad movies. He also twice refers to middlebrow dramas as “ambitious,” even though they’re defined by their formal conservatism. To quote the bard Inigo Montoya, “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Farber closes out his argument with this kids-these-days sentiment:

Younger critics in particular are desperate to prove that they’re hip, and so they champion esoteric, highbrow movies — “The Tree of Life,” “Meek’s Cutoff,” “The Future” — that most audiences are more likely to find ponderous, impenetrable or impossibly precious. These younger reviewers also have a fondness for lowbrow fare — gross-out comedies like “Superbad” or violent genre pictures like “Bellflower” and “Zombieland.”

Clearly if us kids weren’t so focused on hipster posturing, we could appreciate the real pleasures of cinema: preachy melodramas about Real World Issues! This anti-youth potshot is in character with the rest of the article, whose overall point seems to be, “Why can’t critics go back to loving mediocre, respectable movies like they used to?” The answer, of course, is that they do. Many critics have been blown away by The Help, just as many swooned at The King’s Speech. Mediocre movies will always find an audience eager to have its intelligence and taste flattered.

All told, I think Farber’s article really pissed me off because it’s unnecessarily whiny. It’s good-natured whining, sure, but when your only grievance is that critics aren’t pouring enough adulation onto middle-of-the-road dramas, that’s definitely whining. The whole piece is spectacularly misjudged; thankfully, Mark Olsen offered up a very smart retort, again in the L.A. Times. No offense to Mr. Farber, who sounds like a fine writer and fellow, but when all you have to say is “I want more movies that alleviate my guilt and don’t take risks,” you don’t really have anything meaningful to say.

1 Comment

Filed under Cinema